Scale
- Capped by our capacity, not your budget
- Dedicated publisher relationships
- Digital PR campaigns included
- White-label reporting
- Direct line to the person doing the work
A link building programme built around evidence rather than volume promises.
After enough campaigns you learn that the difference between a link that works and a link that does nothing is almost never the metric on the domain. It is whether a real person would ever read the page it sits on. We select for that first and let the metrics follow.
No, and you should be wary of anyone who does. We can guarantee where a link is placed, that it is live, and that we will keep checking it. What a search engine does with that is outside anybody's control.
Placement and indexation are different problems. A link can be live and correct for weeks before a crawler gets to that page, particularly on smaller publishers. We report the live URL on the day it publishes so you are never waiting on a tool to tell you the work happened.
Sometimes, and it depends entirely on the page. We will look at it and give you an honest read on whether publishers will take it.
By placement, on the publisher, agreed before we start. There is no bulk discount for volume because volume is not what we are selling.
Often, yes. It usually starts with an audit and an unhappy conversation, and the first phase is subtraction rather than addition.
Yes. Reports can go out unbranded or under your own, and we are used to being the party that never speaks to the end client.
We find out on the next scheduled check, tell you, and go back to the publisher. If it cannot be restored we replace it or credit it. This is written into how we work rather than offered case by case.
Nothing in the report is a score we invented. Where we quote a third-party metric we name the tool and the date it was pulled, because those numbers move and a figure without a date is decoration.
Alongside new placements, each report lists everything we re-checked from previous cycles and its current state. Links that disappeared appear in the report as clearly as links that went live.
Reports are written on the assumption that somebody sceptical will read them. Every placement carries the live URL, the anchor used, the target page, the publication date and a short note explaining why that publisher was on the list in the first place.
The publisher list is deliberately narrow and grows slowly. Every addition is read, checked and usually trialled on our own projects before a client sees it.
We started as an in-house team doing this for one portfolio of sites, which is a useful way to learn the trade because you cannot hand the consequences to somebody else at the end of the quarter. When the process worked well enough that people started asking to borrow it, it became a service.
The team is small on purpose. Every publisher relationship is held by a person rather than a database, and there is a hard limit on how many of those relationships one person can maintain honestly. That limit is what caps our capacity.
We have been doing this long enough to have made most of the available mistakes at our own expense. The process on this page is largely a list of things we now refuse to repeat.
A companion project of ours goes deeper into the measurement side of all this:
The first step is always the audit, and it stands on its own — plenty of people take the audit, act on it themselves, and we never hear from them again. That is a perfectly good outcome.